Showing posts with label law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label law. Show all posts

Sunday, July 22, 2012

Corporate Censorship of Independent Blogs & Websites


At a time when the possibility of increased internet censorship and policing through SOPA and PIPA caused huge national outcries, protests, and a partial shutdown of the internet through voluntary website "blackouts," it is perhaps no surprise to learn that censorship still continues to rear its ugly head in corporate America.

One respected direct-selling company which formerly encouraged its independent consultants to blog and utilize social networks to promote their business, recently published its new policies.

Among the changes was a new policy that demands that all self-employed consultants hire an attorney from a hand-full of attorneys picked by the corporation to look at all "independent personal websites" and sign off on them by the end of the year to make sure the websites comply with the new policies.

The company may now require the passwords to the blogs and websites it approves.

Definition of Website
  • web site: a computer connected to the internet that maintains a series of web pages on the World Wide Web; -- wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
  • A website, also written as Web site, web site, or simply site, is a set of related web pages content such as text, images, video, audio, etc. -- Wikipedia
  •  A set of interconnected webpages, usually including a homepage, generally located on the same server, and prepared and maintained as a collection of information by a person, group, or organization. -- http://www.thefreedictionary.com/website
While the definition of a website clearly involves multiple interconnected pages, not only are all consultants being required to pay expensive legal fees to make sure their independent websites now meet the new policies, but the term "independent personal website" might be applied at the company's discretion to Facebook and any other pages, articles, social networks and/or other websites where the company was ever mentioned.

In 1997 Mattel, Inc. tried something comparable. The "Pink Anger" outrage over certain publications and websites being sued and forced out of business, ensured that sales of the Barbie doll never again saw dramatic increases like they did in the 1990s.

Censorship and heavy-handed legal maneuverings are never popular with the American public. Creating a new policy that punishes small business owners for following the previous policies is also frowned upon. But creating a legal scenario where only representatives who can afford attorneys can survive is not only bad business, it is un-American.

Also see: Barbie Collectors vs. Mattel: 1997's 'Pink Anger' - National Barbie Collecting Examiner

Sunday, July 15, 2012

Barbie Collectors vs. Mattel: 1997's 'Pink Anger' - National Barbie Collecting Examiner


15th anniversary of Pink Anger: Barbie fans vs. Mattel

I was a staff writer for Barbie Bazaar magazine, as well as a contributor to Miller's Fashion Doll magazine, White's Guide to Collecting and other doll collecting magazines in 1997 when Mattel's legal department made the business decision to clamp down hard on people with Barbie doll websites, magazines, etc. Almost anything and anyone who used the word Barbie in any form or fashion not under Mattel's direct control received legal cease and desist letters. This article tells the story of Pink Anger.

The Barbie doll reached the height of its collectibility in 1997 with even brand-new dolls commanding staggering prices on the secondary market. In 1997, Barbie was responsible for 80% of sales in the doll segment of the billion dollar toy market. Then something went wrong.

Read the article at: 15th anniversary of Pink Anger: Barbie fans vs. Mattel - National Barbie Collecting Examiner

Sunday, July 31, 2011

How to Lose Your Car to a Car Repair Shop Without Defaulting on a Bill - Yahoo! Voices



How to Lose Your Car to a Car Repair Shop Without Defaulting on a Bill

Many people do not realize that a vehicle can be impounded by an automotive place even if there is no problem with payment for services. I lost a vehicle to a repair shop in Tennessee which kept it for months without repairing it and then refused to return it. To my shock, I found out the law would probably be on their side.

Read how this former shop girl lost her Toyota Corolla to Oil Change Plus in Nashville, TN at: How to Lose Your Car to a Car Repair Shop Without Defaulting on a Bill - Yahoo! Voices

Friday, July 22, 2011

Top Ten Reasons Why it is Wrong to Copy or Rewrite Someone Else's Article « Seekyt

Top Ten Reasons Why it is Wrong to Copy or Rewrite Someone Else's Article

The internet has made it so easy for people with no moral compass to steal the work of others. Frequently, I find my articles and photos copied or slightly rewritten and posted on someone else's site or blog in blatant cases of copyright infringement and plagiarism.

Read article at: Top Ten Reasons Why it is Wrong to Copy or Rewrite Someone Else's Article « Seekyt: 

Also see: Plagiarism and Copyright Infringement: Thou Shalt Not Steal - InfoBarrel

Friday, February 19, 2010

Plagiarism and Copyright Infringement: Thou Shalt Not Steal - InfoBarrel






 Plagiarism and Copyright Infringement: Thou Shalt Not Steal

While I do not claim to be an expert in copyright law, I have learned a few simple rules which I see broken again and again on websites, blogs and discussion forums. I have become more and more amazed by the amount of plagiarism that seems to be accepted. Much of it, I believe, is due to ignorance and not malicious intent.